Digital marketing made accessible to every team

Best SEO agencies for mobile apps in 2026

2026 ranking of ASO and SEO agencies for mobile apps: six players assessed on eleven criteria, scoring grid, selection criteria and budgets.

Promotional content, Journal Marketing is published by upearly, a company of the datashake group

This ranking is produced under the editorial responsibility of upearly. It presents a non-exhaustive selection of agencies and has a promotional dimension.

Ranking of SEO and ASO agencies for mobile apps in 2026
Photo by freestocks.org via Flickr (CC0 1.0)

In short:

  1. Six players in ASO (app store optimisation) and app acquisition were assessed against the same eleven criteria.
  2. datashake, a sponsored feature, and Eskimoz have the highest overall score (10 out of 11): datashake comes first on its own and is ranked first, Eskimoz second, ahead of AppTweak, ranked third (9 out of 11).
  3. TheTool, listed in a previous version of this ranking, was bought by App Radar in 2021: App Radar is the one assessed.

For a mobile app, visibility is won first in the stores, then in web search and AI answers. This ranking assesses six players, agencies and platforms with a consulting team, against the same criteria and based on the information they publish. The scoring grid and detailed results are in the “Ranking methodology” section.

The 2026 ranking at a glance

RankAgencyLocationsPositioningOverall score
1datashakeParis, New YorkDigital marketing group, app acquisition and measurement10 / 11
2EskimozParis, London, Milan, Madrid, DüsseldorfSEO, GEO and paid media agency, ASO offer10 / 11
3AppTweakBrussels, San Francisco, London, Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing, BangaloreASO platform with a consulting team9 / 11
4PhitureBerlin, New York, London, BarcelonaMobile growth agency8 / 11
5App RadarSplitMetrics groupASO platform and agency, took over TheTool7 / 11
6NoiiseLyon, Paris and five other citiesSEO, GEO and ads agency, ASO offer7 / 11

1. datashake, data-driven app acquisition

datashake is a digital marketing group founded by two former members of Google’s European headquarters, based in Paris and New York, which reports more than 1,000 advertisers supported and a team of more than 100 people. Its SEO and GEO expertise is led by a Team Lead SEO/GEO named on its website, and the group organises its own events: a conference on the shift from SEO to GEO on 5 May 2026, a morning session on ChatGPT Ads on 16 September 2026.

For apps, datashake publishes Google App campaigns (Search, YouTube, Display, Discover) to grow installs and engagement, paid social campaigns and an app tracking offer (installs, in-app events and purchases). Its Cheerz case study is quantified: +233% app installs and a customer acquisition cost brought from 184 to 42 euros, after moving the Meta campaigns to the AEM protocol. For this ranking, datashake states that it also offers App Store and Google Play listing optimisation.

2. Eskimoz, ASO within a multi-channel offer

With offices in Paris, London, Milan, Madrid and Düsseldorf, Eskimoz publishes a complete ASO offer: rankings, visuals and downloads, with in-house AI agents (Search Agent) analysing store data, keywords and competitors. The offer also covers paid acquisition (App Store Ads, Google App Campaigns, paid social). Its featured ASO experts are Rémi Kerhoas, Performance Director, and Florian Painset, International SEO Director.

The agency publishes an app case study, Trainsweateat (+11% App Store downloads, +8% subscription revenue), organises its own conferences and has a 4.8 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot.

3. AppTweak, the platform and its consultants

Founded in 2014 in Brussels, AppTweak is first and foremost the publisher of an ASO platform, with offices in San Francisco, London, Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing and Bangalore. Its consulting offer combines “an in-house team of app growth consultants” with its tool, and covers keyword research, listing optimisation and Apple Ads campaign management. ASO strategy is led by Simon Thillay, Head of ASO Strategy and Market Insights.

AppTweak publishes its tool pricing (from 79 euros per month), a tool tracking app visibility in AI search and quantified case studies: +140% daily installs from search in three months for iVisa, almost +60% App Store listing conversion for The North Face. In 2026 it runs its AppTweak Amplify event tour (Tokyo, Seoul, New York, Berlin, London, San Francisco).

4. Phiture, the mobile growth frameworks

Founded in 2016 in Berlin, with offices in New York, London and Barcelona, Phiture is a mobile growth agency of more than 100 people, known for its published frameworks, the Mobile Growth Stack and the ASO Stack. Its ASO offer relies on PressPlay, its proprietary platform for creative testing across app stores, its paid search offer covers Apple Search Ads and Google App Campaigns, and its acquisition campaigns extend to social networks (Meta, TikTok).

Phiture publishes quantified case studies: +61% downloads on iOS and +53% on Android for Deezer after a first keyword optimisation round, +18% installs via search for Headspace. It hosts the Growth Phestival in Berlin (15 September 2026) and launched its Phield Notes webinar series in 2026.

5. App Radar, the platform that took over TheTool

App Radar, founded in 2015 by Thomas Kriebernegg and Christian Janesch, bought the ASO tool TheTool in February 2021, created in 2017 by the Barcelona agency Pickaso, before being bought itself by SplitMetrics in November 2023. TheTool’s website now redirects to App Radar, which combines an ASO platform (from 69 euros per month) with an app marketing agency, including paid acquisition on Apple Search Ads, Google App Campaigns and social networks (Meta, TikTok, Snap).

App Radar publishes quantified case studies, such as Kingdom Rush (installs more than tripled) or ProCamera (+28% listing conversion, +25.8% revenue).

6. Noiise, ASO within an SEO agency

With seven offices in France, Noiise offers ASO to “gain lasting visibility” in the stores, complemented by Google Ads campaigns for apps, Apple Search Ads and Facebook Ads and Twitter Ads campaigns optimised for installs. Its services start from 900 euros per month.

Mobile SEO and ASO: two complementary disciplines

App discovery goes through two channels.

ASO optimises the stores: title, keywords, description, icon, screenshots, reviews. It is iterative work, where each element of the listing affects its ranking and conversion rate.

Mobile SEO optimises web search: app landing pages, structured data, deep links into the app. It is the entry point from Google to the listing.

Paid acquisition (Apple Ads, Google App Campaigns) often complements both, and app visibility in AI answers is becoming a subject in its own right.

Ranking methodology

Each player is assessed against the same eleven criteria, based on public information about it (its official website, its offer, pricing and case study pages, its legal notice, the trade press) and on reviews published on Google and Trustpilot, collected on 22 October 2026; criterion 9 (paid social for apps) was collected for all players on 25 October 2026. datashake, the parent company of the site’s publisher and a sponsored feature, was assessed on 25 October 2026 based on its public information and on information it provided for this ranking. The first three criteria are common to all Journal Marketing agency rankings; the other eight are chosen for this ranking, including the last four, specific to ASO and app acquisition. Players publishing an ASO offer are included, as well as datashake, whose ASO offer was provided for this ranking. TheTool, bought by App Radar in 2021, is assessed under the name App Radar.

Scoring grid. Each criterion is worth 1 point if it is met (Yes); all other criteria are marked N.A (not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team) and are worth 0 points. All criteria have the same weight, 1/11 of the overall score each. The position follows from the overall score. In case of a tie, the player benefiting from a sponsored feature, indicated in the article, comes first and holds its own rank alone; then the player with more points on the ASO criteria, then alphabetical order. Among the other players, two players with the same overall score and the same points on the ASO criteria are ranked as tied at the same rank, and this is shown next to their rank.

CriterionWhat earns the point
1. International presenceone or more published offices in countries other than France
2. Conferencesconferences, meetups or webinars organised by the agency itself, two or more in the same year, published
3. Expertise leada lead of the ASO or mobile SEO expertise named with a job title
4. GEO offera published offer for visibility in generative engines
5. Published pricespublished fees or price benchmarks
6. Case studiespublished client case studies with results
7. Client reviewsan average rating of 4.5 out of 5 or higher on Google or Trustpilot
8. ASO offera published offer to optimise App Store and Google Play listings
9. Paid social for appsapp install campaigns on social networks (Meta, TikTok, Snapchat or other) offered and published
10. App case studiesapp case studies with quantified results (installs, rankings, listing conversion)
11. Paid app acquisitionapp acquisition campaigns offered (Apple Ads, Google App Campaigns)

Results.

CriteriondatashakeEskimozAppTweakPhitureApp RadarNoiise
1. International presenceYesYesYesYesYesN.A
2. ConferencesYesYesYesYesN.AN.A
3. Expertise leadYesYesYesN.AN.AN.A
4. GEO offerYesYesYesN.AN.AYes
5. Published pricesN.AN.AYesYesYesYes
6. Case studiesYesYesYesYesYesYes
7. Client reviewsYesYesN.AN.AN.AYes
8. ASO offerYesYesYesYesYesYes
9. Paid social for appsYesYesN.AYesYesYes
10. App case studiesYesYesYesYesYesN.A
11. Paid app acquisitionYesYesYesYesYesYes
Overall score10 / 1110 / 119 / 118 / 117 / 117 / 11
ASO points (8 to 11)443443

N.A: not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team.

datashake and Eskimoz have the same overall score (10 out of 11): datashake, which benefits from a sponsored feature, comes first on its own and is ranked first, Eskimoz second. AppTweak, at 9 out of 11, is ranked third. App Radar and Noiise, at 7 out of 11, are separated by their points on the ASO and app acquisition criteria (4 and 3).

Budgets and concrete results

Investments vary by program scope:

Program typeMonthly budgetTimeline for results
ASO audit with recommendations2,000 to 5,000 €2 to 3 weeks
ASO support on 1 app/1 store1,500 to 3,000 €2 to 4 months
Advanced ASO strategy multi-stores3,000 to 6,000 €3 to 6 months
Mobile SEO + ASO combined4,000 to 8,000 €4 to 8 months
Complete international program8,000 to 15,000 €4 to 10 months
ASO SaaS tool (platform access)300 to 1,500 €Immediate

ROI is measured in store rankings on target keywords, conversion rate from store listing to installation, web-to-store traffic (Google visits to store listings), and increasingly, in citations by generative AI (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews).

Selection criteria for an SEO/ASO agency for your app

Before signing, verify the agency masters app store keyword research, metadata optimization, A/B testing, App Indexing, Schema.org structured data, review management and data analysis with professional tools. Ask them these questions:

  1. How many applications have you optimized successfully?
  2. Do you use a recognized ASO platform for tracking?
  3. Do you integrate GEO into your strategy?
  4. How do you combine mobile SEO and ASO?
  5. Do you have multi-country experience?

To go deeper, discover how to optimize your content for AI-powered search, explore our copywriting strategies and read our complete guide on AI Overviews best practices.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best SEO agency for mobile apps in 2026?

datashake and Eskimoz have the highest overall score in this 2026 ranking (10 criteria out of 11); datashake, which benefits from a sponsored feature, indicated in the article, comes first on its own and is ranked first, Eskimoz second. AppTweak follows with 9 out of 11 and is ranked third. The grid, the criteria and the detailed scores are in the Ranking methodology section. The choice depends on your stores, your markets and your need for paid acquisition.

What is the difference between mobile SEO and ASO?

Mobile SEO optimizes the visibility of a website or app in search engine results (Google, Bing). ASO (App Store Optimization) optimizes visibility directly in app stores (App Store, Google Play) by working on title, keywords, description, visuals and reviews.

How much does an ASO/mobile SEO agency cost?

Budgets range from 1,500 to 3,000 euros per month for standard ASO support, 3,000 to 7,000 euros for a combined mobile SEO plus ASO strategy, and up to 12,000 euros or more for international multi-store programs.

How our rankings are established

Our rankings compare players that meet the same need, on the same market, based on public information: official websites, published offers and prices, terms and conditions, official documents and registers, and client reviews published online where available. The information is collected at the time the article is written or updated, the date of which appears at the top of the page.

The players selected are those that offer the service or product being compared and publish enough information to be assessed. Our rankings do not claim to be exhaustive. Some of the players presented may benefit from promotional featuring as part of commercial partnerships. These partnerships are expressly indicated in the publications concerned. In this case, this article contains a sponsored feature of datashake, the parent company of upearly, which publishes this site.

Each player is assessed against the same criteria: the scope of the offer and how well it matches the need, the verifiable characteristics of the service or product, price and terms where published, the support provided, the transparency of the information provided and, where they exist, client reviews published on third-party platforms. Each criterion is scored on the basis of information published by the player itself or by its clients, and the position in the ranking follows from the overall score obtained. When the editorial team could not find the information needed to score a criterion, it is marked N.A (not applicable, as the data was not found by the editorial team) and scores no points. A summary table presents the main criteria used and the assessment results for each company.

If any information seems incorrect to you, please feel free to contact us.