<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>inp on Journal Marketing</title><link>https://journal-marketing.fr/en/tags/inp/</link><description>Recent content in inp on Journal Marketing</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://journal-marketing.fr/en/tags/inp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Core Web Vitals: what really matters in 2026</title><link>https://journal-marketing.fr/en/blog/core-web-vitals-2026/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journal-marketing.fr/en/blog/core-web-vitals-2026/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;INP replaced FID and punishes script-heavy interfaces.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;An LCP under 2.5 seconds remains the reference threshold on mobile.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The ranking impact of CWV is real but marginal compared to relevance.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Core Web Vitals&lt;/strong&gt; remain the health barometer of a site. But not all signals are equal, and chasing a perfect score often makes teams lose sight of what matters.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>